Isn’t it odd that they couldn't find a study in the United States they liked? Thirteen of fifteen studies done in the USA found that abortions increase the risk of breast cancer. Our country has the best scientists and researchers in the world. They didn’t publish these studies, because it wasn’t what they wanted to hear. Thousands of women WILL CONTINUE TO DIE every year, needlessly, because of politics.

On another page, you will read where Dr. Joel Brind, the world's most renowned authority on abortion/breast cancer, shreds the Danish Study to pieces, and when the errors were corrected, did show the increased risk. Reputable medical journals will no longer run this flawed study. Click below for Dr. Brind's "Comprehensive Review and Meta Analysis" of the Abortion/Breast Cancer risk.

So now, if anyone, who is involved in a study, is pro-life, then that study cannot be trusted. We can now add pro-lifers to the distrustful list along with Catholics and Blacks. Now, we have about 65% of the world’s population on the list.

And if someone happened to be Pro-life, Catholic and Black -- WOW! Wouldn't that be terrible? Their chance of being involved in such a study would be less than that of a snowball's chance in hell. Are these people serious, or are they a big joke?

Politics and ideology should have NO part in medicine. It's absolutely ludicrous.

How they can continue to perpetuate this cover-up is mind boggling, in view of the fact that Dr. Clark Heath, who is the head of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research of the American Cancer Society, on February 20, 1998, conceded to one aspect of the ABC link: that a delayed first full term birth increases breast cancer risk. The longer the time to her first full term delivery, the greater the risk. Does not an abortion delay a first full term delivery? They just refuse to admit the truth: that an abortion was the reason for the delay.

Quite a concession, isn't it? So then, why aren’t women told of this one aspect before they have an abortion and why don't we hear of this from the media? Why didn't it make the headlines and why isn't it included with all the other breast cancer risks?

Do abortions mean that much to them, that they don't care if thousands of women die every year, solely from the fact they had an induced abortion? How could this happen in the United States of America?

Critics who formerly dismissed the possibility of a relationship between induced abortion and breast cancer are increasingly on the defensive, largely as a consequence of the findings of a fascinating study by Dr. Janet Daling, (who by the way, is pro-choice) and her colleagues at Seattle's Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Their study showed that abortions increase the risk of breast cancer on an average of 50%.

But the Daling study contained even more frightening results, largely ignored by the media. If a woman had obtained her first abortion after age 30, her risk jumped by 110 percent. And if she had her first abortion before she turned 18, the likelihood of having breast cancer increased by 150 percent.

Worse yet, if she has a family history (mother, sister, aunt) of breast cancer and had a first abortion after age 30, her risk went up by 270 percent.

Most ominous of all were the results for women who had an abortion before age 18 and who also had a family history of breast cancer. Twelve women in the Daling study fit that description. Every one of them got breast cancer before age 45. Not 50%, or 75%, but EVERY ONE.

This is absolutely horrendous. These are ELECTIVE surgeries and every risk MUST be told to the patient, or the doctor and clinic will have a lawsuit on their hands, which they can NOT win.

Still, the abortion industry will not even warn these very high risk teenagers. Would you believe, they and many politicians (mostly Democrats) even fight all parental notification laws, and who else would know if there's a history of breast cancer in the family but the parents, especially the mother?

The Daling Study was funded by the NCI. Why didn't they run this study on their website instead of the flawed Melbye/Danish Study? Because it's not what they wanted to hear. Click below for details of the Dr. Janet Daling Study.

Recently, in the United States, there were two lawsuits. Two teenage girls won because they were not warned about the risks of an abortion, including the breast cancer risk. The amounts of the settlement were not disclosed. Also there was one in Australia which was won.

But, you can bet your bottom dollar that this is just the tip of the iceberg. It's only a matter of time before there will be a flood of lawsuits brought on by women who were not warned of the risk prior to their abortion.
It's the Tobacco Industry all over all over again. How many more women have to die before the truth wins out?

In summation, let's isolate the facts that are indisputable:

1. It's an indisputable fact that estrogens are strong growth promoters of normal and most cancerous breast tissue.

2. It's an indisputable fact that most known risk factors for breast cancer are attributable to some form of estrogen overexposure.

3. It's an indisputable fact that maternal estradiol (estrogen) rises 20-fold (2,000%) during the first trimester of a normal pregnancy.

4. It's an indisputable fact that abnormal cells are more vulnerable to cancerous changes than normal cells.

5. It's an indisputable fact that pregnancies which abort spontaneously (miscarriage) usually generate subnormal amounts of estradiol; no increased risk of breast cancer is seen.

6. It's an indisputable fact that the incidence of breast cancer is dramatically increased in rats whose pregnancies are aborted.


Abortion Breast-Cancer References
Dr. Joel Brind's Meta Analysis of the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link
Congressional Subcommittee Hearing on War on Cancer
World Conference on Breast Cancer
Dr. Janet Daling's Study of the Abortion-Breast Cancer Link

Frank Joseph MD
Email: DFjosephMD



Home