Folks, I'll be brief. (no pun intended)
The people who have been arguing for the unborn in the courts across the land have been
arguing on the wrong legal grounds.
And if you did it right, there would be no need to argue the personhood, or even
perhaps the humanity of the unborn.
Our defense of the unborn should be based on the Preamble of the United States
Constitution. That Preamble reads:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish
Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general
Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Webster's Unabridged tells us that posterity is: "1. succeeding or future
generations collectively... 2. all descendants of one person."
An unborn child of whatever age is certainly one of the descendants of her
mother and father.
So if we argue that the Preamble says that the United States Constitution was ordained
and established to establish justice for our posterity, provide for the common defence
of our posterity, promote the general welfare of our posterity, and secure the
blessings of liberty to our posterity, the Court would be hard put to say that there is
some kind of private right to destroy our posterity through abortion.
I can't take credit for this idea, and I don't remember who first suggested it, but
I pass it along to you.
Second point:
It seems to me that we distinguish between unborn humans and born ones in unintended
ways. By making abortion the subject of a separate law, we are setting the unborn apart
from us in terms of who qualifies as being fully human. I believe that this is one of the
fundamental reasons why we are having a problem with abortion in the first place.
If we had included the unborn under the protection of the homicide statutes from the
very beginning, I believe that we would not be having the problems with abortion we are
having today.
So it is obvious, to me at least, that the way to remedy this situation is for state
prosecutors to prosecute abortionists under the existing homicide statutes. Already I
see that occasionally, this is being done. I think it needs to be tried in as many places
as possible.
'Nuff said?
Background graciously provided by: